Ms Peters was awarded close to $10,000 in the courts by proving her 2006 Civic Hybrid didn’t live up to the fuel economy numbers Honda advertised.
Peters sued Honda in late 2011, proving that her Honda not only did not live up to the Honda claimed EPA fuel-efficiency estimates, but also that her mileage decreased after she gave her car to Honda to have her Civic’s computer reset, at Honda’s recommendation, to extend the vehicles onboard battery life. In Peters case, Ms Peters claimed that Honda "fraudulently represented gas mileage and hybrid performance. Also fraudulently induced me to do software update that made things worse."
Honda rebutted with a number of claims by "happy" customers whose Civics are at lease meeting the EPA efficiency claims, and by arguing that EPA’s numbers are estimates and personal driving methods will vary results. It was in February the small claims court commissioner in Los Angeles recently ruled in favor of Peters and granted Peters $9867, however Honda is appealing the case.
This case is yet another hit for Honda, which is currently struggling to recover from the disaster tsunami a year ago and also from the flop of its new Civic redesign for 2012. If this ruling stands up, it could be a landmark case for Automotive manufacturers everywhere.
Looking for some Weird News? make sure you check out our Weird News Stories Website
